"PMS" or Pre Menstrual Syndrome, has long been the standard excuse for female bad behavior from slight bitchiness to outright murder.   It has a long and varied history among medical investigators.  This history dates back to the time of Hippocrates, and the first reference in a scientific journal was by Franc in 1931.  In 1964, Dr. Katherina Dalton brought attention to this condition with her first book on PMS, which promoted the theory that this condition was caused by either a progesterone deficiency or an imbalance in the estrogen-progesterone ratio.  Later, she also extensively promoted the use of progesterone therapy for its treatment.


PMS has been locked in with various political and legal perspectives.  For example, murder convictions and felony charges have been reduced to manslaughter and misdemeanors, respectively, because of the argument that the accused woman suffered from PMS.  Feminists have voiced concern about this trend indicating that the use of PMS as a defense in criminal or civil matters could result in a negative impact on women’s push toward equalization with men.  Feminists plead that generalizations about women should not be made when assessing the legal or political aspects of this condition.  Another point of view suggests that this condition has held back many women over the years.


I'll admit that whenever even the possibility of a female president for our great nation is voiced, and it takes about a New York Minute for some guy to say something like: "Yeah, but keep her away from the nuke codes during That Time of the Month" I get really pissed.  I mean, since when do men have the market cornered on 100% even-tempered, perfect judgement?  I usually counter it with something about how I might be mentally unstable for a few days before I start to bleed but at least I always think with my Big Brain--the one inside my skull and not the one inside my pants.  So there, mass generalizing male asshole. 






But really, now that I'm on the "other side" of the 40 mark (not by much mind you) I have a pretty good handle on my cycle.  Nothing sneaks up on me.  I could set a clock by it so I always know when the slightest angry glance or mild criticism or even spilled coffee will send me into an emotional spiral of tears that will only be calmed by an entire bag of Lay's potato chips and two liters of Real Coke.  I have actually had the thought (and voiced it) during that week of delight that I have to have a Wendy's cheeseburger or I will kill the person nearest me, whether they are my own flesh and blood or a complete stranger.  I'm not fun this week, as many can attest.  But I refuse to use it as an excuse.  It's a natural part of me--of all women.  Yes, we bleed for 7 (not 5 you idiot) days every month and survive.   Deal with that.  In order to do this, hormones begin to slip and slide around to allow our bodies to prepare every single month for the possibility of (heaven forbid) fertilization and embryo implantation.    One can't expect this drastic shift of mood-altering chemicals to occur without the body and mind taking some notice.


It's a predictable thing:  two weeks to the hour before the blood starts a-flowing I get a sharp double-me-over cramp in my side.  This, I have learned, is Ovulation.  Once I stand up, the Mister takes one look at me and reaches for the Wheaties box 'cause Mama is gonna need some attention--it's biology you know.  The next week, with the Mister crouched in the corner begging me to lay off already, I get lazy, cranky, irrationally hungry all day long, I can't regulate my body temperature so I want to run out in the snow in shorts because the house is so damn hot.  It's advisable for me to stop at 2 drinks because I'm sure to spin out of control after a 3rd, picking fights where none needed picking (and This Wench is NO lightweight so this is saying something-- I am an expensive date).  The merest utterings of my beloved Wenchlings make we want to call an adoption agency and they threaten that they have child protective services on speed dial (oh, wait, that's just a Teenager in the House thing, never mind).  I don't want to exercise, which I love to do, which could actually help me ironically--screw it pass the Oreos.  I will cry at the slightest perceived wrongdoing-- or when I realize we are out of whatever it is my poor body is craving at that moment.  I feel like I'm wrapped in a blanket somehow, my senses are muted and all I want to do is sleep. One sideways glance from the Mister and I want to punch him, hard, then retreat to the couch and take a nap, curled up with my Doritos bag, growling like an angry mama racoon.  He knows to lie low.







Instead of worrying about too much though, I just give in to it.  I know it won't last, just like I know within days I'll be doubled over when "de blood it come, Mary".  


So fuck off and give me that chip bag or else.
cheers
Wench (for real)






I write erotica. I read erotica. I enjoy the odd porn video but they typically leave me wondering why in the world those people are there doing that in the first place. I respect the entire industry and the necessary service they provide (and had a blast at the Adult Video Network convention in Vegas). But am I writing "porn" or am I writing "erotic fiction?" Does it matter?

"Erotica" according to that enabler (disabler?) of high school research papers Wikipedia is: (from the Greek Eros—"desire") or "curiosa", are works of art, including literature, p
hotography, film, sculpture and painting, that deal substantively with erotically stimulating or sexually arousing descriptions. Erotica is a modern word used to describe the portrayal of the human anatomy and sexuality with high-art aspirations, differentiating such work from commercial porn
ography "Curiosa" is generally used to refer to erotica and pornography as discrete, collectible items, usually in published or printed form.

Typically, "porn" is directed towards men and is purely visual, active with little conversation or back story, as it were. It's aim is to quickly arouse, stimulate and finish. As one of my favorite "secret followers" loves to tell me: "I could care less what they're thinking--give me more chicks in the room, lube and maybe a midget." I respect that.

Men, in my pretty, um, varied experience, ARE visual. I'll never forget being informed that when man is looking at you, whether it's across the board room table or in line at Subway, he is sizing up how you look naked and, how much he'd like to fuck you. Ok, that's fine. It's how men are wired people, and sort of works if you buy into Darwinian Theories of species perpetuation. Men have gotta spread the seed--far and wide, and that urge, while tamped down by our societal acceptance and perhaps somewhat irrational obsession with monogamy, is too ingrained in the lizard brain to simply pretend is "bad" or somehow unacceptable. Mind you, we can be
grateful for some of that necessary programming---all 15-year old boys ultimately must learn to practice what the Big Boys like to call "self control" lest they find themselves in precarious positions with angry fathers--ironically also formerly 15-year old boys themselves.

"Erotica", while not better, is simply different in the same way men and women are different. Erotic stories or novels are usually tales of people's lives that don't "fade to black" when the bedroom door is shut. Granted, some of the stuff I've read lately (the books that cause lovely dents in my drywall when I heave them across the room) are obviously churned out in short order by writers with limited imaginations for readers with the same. However, the books that have stuck with me are the ones that wove an actual web of plot that pulled me in, made me care about the characters and therefore couldn't wait for them to hit the sheets. It goes without saying that in my opinion, we should know a little about the people who are panting against each others' skin before coitus occurs.

I am also a HUGE fan of the super short format I read over the holidays. The BEST erotic fiction anthology I have ever read is the one edited by Violet Blue, former porn star and now media savvy uber-precense on the web, tv, books and wherever else you turn when you want info on Sex. It is really HARD (pun fully intended) to make a hot story work under 5000 words and yours truly is toiling away at said task, writing and submitting and accepting feedback and, ultimately rejections so far. But it's fun to write in a way that writing an entire novel of 60k words or more is not.

Not all novels should or need to include their characters' sex lives as part of the story, but some could benefit from a little more depth. Sex is an integral part of our lives. To deny it is to simply deny your basic humanity. We are programmed to deny it. Yet everything is sold to us with sex, from cars, to colas, to stock brokers to tennis shoes. I consider myself to be a highly sexual person and love reading (and writing) about strong women who realize they too can enjoy this act that for many years and in many cultures still, is reserved for the primary enjoyment of the male.

Life is messy and sex usually is a complicating factor. The sexual tension that exists in a purely natural form between men and women can sometimes spiral out of control and cause adults to make bad decisions. "Porn" just shows us the "bad decision scene"--it depicts the act itself which can be fun to watch (or read for that matter). However, I for one want to know what brought those two (or three or more) people to that place--what lead to the ultimate, animalistic need to gain release through sexual intercourse. The erotic fiction genre has exploded (again, love these puns) and in part I think it's because more and more women are acknowledging that they are allowed to enjoy a story of people who enjoy their sex lives. Yes, it is fantasy, and hence it has a "formula" that most books, be they contemporary, steam-punk, supernatural or historical, adhere to. It's what sells so how can we argue with that? It allows a woman an escape from the ordinary and a glimpse into the life of another--steamy hot passion included.

I do like to find the slightly off-formula ones, but they are few and far between. Even just a tweak of the typical "potentially strong yet currently emotionally weak female is found and liberated sexually by an Alpha male/vamp/were/knight/private detective/cop/politician/CEO/extraordinary Victorian gentleman but is conflicted, usually by the presence of a sub-Alpha male" can be fun. But ultimately, we women write for each other and leave the porn to the guys. Roxanne Rhoads writing as Hazel Mills put it very well:
To me erotica can be much more real, while porn is often very unrealistic. Erotica can
also tell a more complete story. If you read a regular novel about a married couple or a couple in love, it does not tell the whole story of their relationship because the sex scenes are often omitted or glossed over. In erotica you can get the whole story including the steamy sex scenes. Erotica stimulates the mind and the body, arousing emotions and the imagination.

Or as I always say, getting there is half the fun. . . erotica allows us to take the entire journey, and enjoy the final destination even more.

The Wench will put on her Soccer MILF hat for the weekend and board a bus full of 12-year girls and their parents to trek to Richmond, Virginia for the Jefferson Cup tournament. Not exactly my idea of a whole shitload of fun but I'm bringing a laptop, my imagination and enough booze to sink a ship. I'll survive. Go WAZA!
on-on
Wenchie
p.s. I'd let THIS vampire bite on me all day long. . .



Kentucky Violated NCAA Rules While Recruiting Basketball-Playing Dog


Hilarious--He IS a Good Boy--Hey, I want a University of Kentucky chew toy!
It's that time of year again--the triumvirate week of Wenchling Numero Uno's birthday (and it was a milestone as I can now officially kick him out into the world as an adult and
no longer worry about him. . . .right)/St. Patrick's Day that oh so important day of beer drinking near and dear to That Other Wench's heart/March Madness, when normally sane people wear odd colors to work, go blind filling out "brackets" and pick fights with their co-workers that can descend into serious fisticuffs.

I for one LOVE IT and not just because my beloved Louisville Cardinals lead by Number One Kentucky Horn Dog Rick (hey let's check out the kitchen) Pitino get to play.
No, This Wench loves the atmosphere of March--the whole "screw-work-lets-watch-roundball" mentality of it. She comes by it naturally, having been raised in what many Hoosier m
ay argue against as The Number
one B-ball State--the Bluegrass One (a.k.a. God's Country).
Go CARDS--Let's at least get t
he chance to play the Dookies, whaddaya say?





OK, enough of that. Here's a sad thing---The last known living wolverine, that nasty, slightly skunky beast that has a perma

nent case of PMS, was found dead in the thumb area of The Wench's adopted state.
Never mind that she (yes, her PMS was legit) was likely an illegal alien from Canada...for more on this, click on over to Wolverine Beer's Blog.


And finally, this bit from The Guardian in the UK (no not the university, jeez people):

According to a study, when people feel they have been morally virtuous by savi

ng the planet through their purchases of organic baby food, for example, it leads to the “licensing [of] selfish and morally questionable behaviour”, otherwise known as “moral balancing” or “compensatory ethics”…

Canadian psychologists Nina Mazar and Chen-Bo Zhong argue that people who wear what they call the “halo of green consumerism” are less likely to be kind to others, and more likely to cheat and steal. “Virtuous acts can license subsequent asocial and unethical behaviours,” they write.

Of course, The Wench came by this info via a friend who is constantly looking for excuses to find fault with any liberal act, and "environmentalists are dicks" was the title of his email to me. Bill, I love you dearly, truly I do and I find our little discussions scintillating and mind-opening but this? It's hilarious! I knew there was a reason people love/hate Ann Arbor and fights break out in the parking lot of Whole Foods because the parking is so limited.
"I'm a more righteous consumer than YOU, you Prius driving, over-priced organic food buying, non-shaving asshole!" being the general theme of those fights.
Starting and ending with fist-fights, the Wench bids you. . . adieu. Oh, and for those looking for more HOT STUFF, stay tuned. It's formulating in my naughty brain as we speak!
Go Forth--Drink Beer! Wolverine Beer preferably but we are NOT DYING IT GREEN! that's just gross.
cheers
Bed Wench





md_horiz.jpg

The plastic protagonist of little girls' dreams is being molded into an even more depressing fantasy. In a new collectors' series, Barbie and Ken will be modeled after "Mad Men's" unhappily married couple, Betty and Don Draper, as well as the show's extramarital (and yet still unhappy) couple, Roger Sterling and Joan Holloway. Come on over to my house, let's all play depressed '60s housewife!
Now, of course, these dolls aren't being marketed to little ones. At $74.95 a pop, these are obviously for Mommy and Daddy's toy collection. But there is a delicious irony in Barbie, that longtime purveyor of unrealistic, unhealthy female expectations, being turned into Betty Draper, a woman who finds that the domestic dream is actually a waking nightmare. In fact, Barbie premiered in 1959 and "Mad Men" starts off in 1960. As Robert Thompson, a television and pop culture professor at Syracuse University, told the New York Times, Betty represents "the wife who lives in her dream house whose soul is eaten away." 
It's a rather perfect merchandising partnership, I'd say. But I do have one major complaint: Where the hell are Joan's curves?
(Salon Broadsheet--Tracey Clark-Flory)


(Wench) Yeah, what SHE said!  They made uber-curvy Joan into a molded plastic, snake-hipped, red-headed Sports Illustrated Swimsuit wannabe--and in so doing took away all of her charm!  Real Women CAN BE sizes 12-14 you know.
So I don't know that I'll spring for these pricey plastic toys--The Wench is Officially On a Budget--but I will say that the concept of "playing house" with the dreamy Don or Roger loses its allure as the show moves into the 60's.  Yes, Jon Hamm is an amazingly hunky alpha-male dude ("Jack" anyone?)and he plays the part of they guy who provides Betty with her dream house while fucking every other skirt in his way pretty convincingly.   And I love how Betty is NOT the perfectly sympathetic foil to his handsome evilness.  She's a bitch really, especially to her kids and her brother's wife.  That poor little girl of hers doesn't have a prayer, now that Granpda croaked!    
Of course, at first, we were all shocked and amazed at her capacity for apparent stupidity and blindness--my GOD woman, look at your husband!  Why you are not all over him the moment he walks in and demands his whiskey until the time he leaves the next morning, white shirt pressed within an inch of itself?  But as the show makes its natural progression, we are forced to realize that while he may look nice, Betty's husband is a real cold fish--a liar and an ass, although he somehow manages to champion the one female copywriter in the company, after he helps her out of her "oops, I had a baby" moment in the first season.
In short, NONE of these characters are perfect but they aren't set up to be caricatures of themselves a la "Modern Family" or other mildly amusing yet ultimately unsatisfying sitcoms.  They aren't making fun of their lot in life, merely reflecting a time in our history when people quietly started easing away from presenting a united, perfect, nuclear family front to world while hiding disfunction, infidelity, depression and alcoholism.  Yep, the 60s (the decade into which your Dear Wench was born) was a real shake up for women, men, wives, husbands and the "go along to get along" mentality of the previous decade.   
Wenchie





Kelly Cutrone: Show me the vibrators!

Posted using ShareThis


Olympic torch is passed

Sarcasm! Shatner! A parade of giant beavers! Vancouver closes the Winter Olympics in appropriate style

AP
If Leni Riefenstahl had been Canadian – polite, tasteful restrained -- she'd have directed something like the closing ceremonies of the 21st Winter Olympics. Staged in BC Place Stadium in front of 60,000 people, most of them fresh-faced Canadians who looked as if they were chosen to advertise their country's health care system, the ceremonies were opulent and extravagant, yes, but with a charmingly self-effacing quality correctly described by NBC's Bob Costas as "Walt Disney meets Busby Berkeley." And it was in French and English.
Canadians, Costas mused, have always displayed an ability to laugh at themselves -- a quality sorely lacking in some of their neighbors. At least the humor seemed intentional; why else you would ask William Shatner to speak to a worldwide audience on "What It Means to be Canadian."
"You have to dream big," he said solemnly, "in a land that is the final frontier."
Canadians are not big on sarcasm -- as a Canadian actor on "30 Rock" recently explained it, "We have a small Jewish population" -- but there's a limit to even Canadian politeness. It's the first time I've ever heard 60,000 people guffaw.
That changed the mood, observed Costas's co-anchor Al Michaels. So did Catherine O'Hara, who cheerfully warned visitors that, "When you pee your name in the snow, we know who you are."
Then came a parade of what Costas called "the always enjoyable giant inflated beavers." The beavers were followed by a colossal inflatable moose. Back in New York, the Macy's Thanksgiving Parade Committee must have been green.
Jacques Rogge, president of the International Olympic Committee, told everyone, "To the athletes of these games, we say you have made us proud. These were excellent and very friendly games." He was right, and you could see it in the faces of the athletes. Ryan Miller, the star goalie of the U.S. hockey team, had, a little more than two hours earlier, looked distraught when Team USA lost to Canada in overtime. Now, as the athletes paraded around the stadium, he was beaming as he snapped photos on his cell phone.
"This is what the Olympics are about," said Michaels, and the comment wasn't mere sentiment. The whole atmosphere was so friendly and goofy that when the athletes formed a giant June Taylor dancer-like formation it didn't seem to matter that no one could quite understand what letters they were trying to make. Neither, apparently, could Costas, who paused and said, "As we bid fond farewell to Vancouver ..."
Accompanied by his own acoustic guitar, Neil Young made the evening complete by singing "Long May You Run" as the Olympic flame was extinguished. It would have been a great place to end things, but unfortunately, Michael Buble then did an ersatz Broadway-like musical number I couldn't identify backed by oversized Mounties, hockey players and what looked like models wearing giant maple leafs. It was everything the ceremony had not been up to that point -- Canada imagined by Baz Luhrmann.
Oh, Canada: Just one minute of Leonard Cohen would have made it all right.